In today’s episode, I discuss some of the issues related to the Biden Crime Family. Constitutional scholar and professor at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley discusses the damaging emails and how the White House and President Joe Biden are not doing themselves any favor with how they are trying to spin the narrative.
Basically, what they are trying to get us to believe is Hunter Biden “may” have done a few things that “could” get him indicted, but it never involved the President at all. The influence peddling (or pay to play) scheme was never about dangling Joe Biden as the carrot at the end of the stick. Well, if it wasn’t, who is the Big Guy? Who is Celtic? Why would some emails indicate Joe Biden’s name needs to be kept out of the conversation? It seems odd to believe these countries would be giving Hunter Biden millions of dollars solely for his opinions or business acumen. Yet, that’s what the legacy / mainstream media is trying to sell on behalf of the White House and the President.
You can fool All of the people, some of the time; and some of the people, all of the time; but, you cannot fool all of the people all of the time. And, time is running out for the Biden Crime Family. When we look back at how the media colluded to be help Joe Biden and the democrats hide this story in late 2020, it makes you wonder why anyone should ever trust the media again? It also makes you wonder, what would the state of our country be today if the media had done it’s job, rather than act as the propaganda arm of the Democrat party?
In closing, I shift to several people enraged over the term groomer. Apparently, calling people what they are is offensive to them. They are calling it a smear campaign. Well, sorry if it bugs you that most sane people believe innocent children should not be sexually radicalized. If you are enraged by us, it’s you who needs mental health counseling and should never be allowed around impressionable young minds ever again.
To help illustrate why these groomers are so angry, I remind you about the film industry and the movie ratings we have. There is a reason some movies get a G rating, others PG, some PG-13, some R and a few NC-17. We all recognize some films are just not appropriate for a younger audience. Why? Because they are not yet equipped with the experiences or understanding that an older person has. The same goes with radically sexualized topics or discussions. Plus, in every instance of movies ratings, note that the parent or guardian must be involved. When groomers try to drive wedges between parents and children, that should be automatic grounds for dismissal and a permanent record, keeping you away from ever being able to harm a child again.